What Does Getting Better Look Like?
- Brian A. Kavanaugh
- 4 hours ago
- 3 min read
How does a facilitator know when someone is getting better in their creative practice?
The question appears simple.
Often it is answered by looking at the work.
Compare today's drawing to last year's drawing.
Compare the current painting to an earlier one.
Identify what has improved.
But much of what develops within a creative practice is not visible in the finished work.
Curiosity is difficult to frame and hang on a wall.
So is persistence.
So is a growing willingness to take risks.
So is learning how to remain with frustration long enough to discover what comes next.
These developments may eventually become visible in the work.
But they often appear somewhere else first.
They appear in the making.
This creates a challenge.
Facilitators are often asked to recognize growth.
Some artists can describe exactly what they are working toward.
Others communicate those priorities indirectly through their actions, preferences, and decisions.
In either case, facilitators learn to pay attention to what becomes visible in practice.
We may not know what they hope to accomplish.
We may not know what success looks like to them.
We may not know which moments feel important.
What we do have access to are the traces these things leave behind.
We can observe decisions.
We can observe attention.
We can observe avoidance.
We can observe persistence.
We can observe excitement.
We can observe frustration.
Over time, patterns begin to emerge.
When I am working with someone, the finished work is only one source of information.
The experience of making it often reveals much more.
How do they respond to scale?
Do they begin immediately or hesitate?
Do they fill the surface confidently or cautiously?
What happens when they encounter a problem?
What happens when something unexpected occurs?
When do they seek support?
When do they refuse it?
How do they decide when something is finished?
These observations are not evaluations of the drawing.
They are observations of how a person engages with the process of making.
And for facilitators, this engagement often provides important information.
Not simply about what has been made.
But about what is developing.
Most conversations about growth focus on outcomes.
Facilitators often encounter it differently.
Through attention.
Through what is noticed.
Through what becomes recognizable over time.
Because over months and years you begin seeing things that may never fully reveal themselves in the artwork.
Someone becomes more willing to experiment.
Someone becomes more willing to work independently.
Someone becomes more willing to remain with uncertainty.
Someone develops increasingly specific interests.
Someone begins pursuing opportunities they once avoided.
These changes often appear long before they can be measured.
Yet they may be among the clearest indicators that a practice is growing.
Perhaps facilitators can never fully know another person's definition of getting better.
Perhaps that definition belongs to the artist.
What facilitators can do is pay attention.
Not only to what is made.
But to how it is made.
To where curiosity appears.
To where frustration emerges.
To where decisions are made.
To what keeps drawing a person back.
Because growth does not always announce itself through mastery.
Sometimes it first appears as a person becoming increasingly willing to engage with something they find meaningful.
In this sense, getting better may not always mean becoming more skillful.
Sometimes it means becoming more invested.
And sometimes that is the most important thing a facilitator can notice.
Comments